Understanding coatings, in particular multi-layered coating systems, is challenging due to their complexity. They may comprise in the order of ten different ingredients for a single paint formulation and many of such ingredients are not a single, well defined compound but a mixture of isomers or molecular weights and structures. Furthermore, processes in the paint production as well as in the paint application are acting via thermal energy and mechanical forces on polymer chains and dispersed particles. Rupture as well as formation of chemical bonds may occur while dispersed pigments may agglomerate or disassemble into primary particles. Finally, an applied liquid coating undergoes a film-forming process during flash-off of solvent or water and - in most cases - a baking step in which the organic film cures through the formation of chemical X-links between polymers (or the polymerization of different monomers into X-linked polymers). These processes may involve the formation or the vanishing of internal interfaces (or better: interphases) between dislike components. In any case the result is a more or less solid material which limits the number of suitable methods for chemical analysis. On the contrary a plethora of testing methods exists for measuring physical properties, optical values or to observe and rate the coatings resistance against chemicals or UV-light and not least to study the impact of heating, freezing, humidity and mechanical deformation on all these properties.
Finally you'll find below some quotes I find worth to consider in tough times where some are urging others to "follow the science" in order to pursue their political agenda. As scientists we should refer to the imperfection of scientific methods and to the temporary nature of current insights and models which are going to change with further progress and as a result from scientific dispute. Otherwise scientists are going to jeopardise their creditability, since reality will sooner or later dismantle the propagated biased picture of an agreed scientific community without controversal perceptions ("follow THE science"). COVID-19 has shown us how scientists were instrumentalised by politicians whereas some conspiracy theories turned out to be true in retrospect.
We should be aware that once before being a scientist (the neologism was coined by William Whewell in 1833) became a shibboleth of being slovenly (N.R. Campbell, Nature 114 (1924) 788).